>
>
>Jan. 15
>More for Less
>Most college students are carrying a greater 
>share of the cost of their education, even as 
>institutions spend less on teaching them, 
>according to a 
>
report released today.
>The report, published by the Delta Project on 
>Postsecondary Education Costs, Productivity, and 
>Accountability, gives a potentially troubling 
>picture of spending and revenue trends in higher 
>education. Spanning from 2002 to 2006, the 
>report indicates that tuition hikes have 
>resulted in little if any new spending on 
>classroom instruction at public research universities.
>"The public's got it exactly right," said Jane 
>Wellman, head of the Delta Project. "They are 
>jacking up tuition, and they're not re-investing it in quality."
>There's plenty of blame to go around, however, 
>for this predicament. With state support waning 
>for public colleges, rising tuition dollars are 
>merely being used to make up for lost revenue  
>not for hiring more faculty or taking other 
>steps that would arguably improve classroom 
>instruction, the report asserts. On the other 
>hand, the Delta Project suggests that colleges 
>haven't made the hard choices required for 
>adapting to lower subsidies, as evidenced by 
>relatively small changes in spending levels.
>"The data tell us that the spending patterns are 
>not changing, we're just shifting revenue 
>sources," Wellman said. "So what this tells us 
>is we're not dealing with our cost structures, we're just shifting revenues."
>There's not much evidence to suggest that 
>students at public universities are getting more 
>for paying more. Between 2002 and 2006, average 
>tuition at public research universities 
>increased by nearly 27 percent or $1,419, but 
>the spending on each student only went up by 1 
>percent, or $149. In calculating "education and 
>related" spending  the dollars spent directly 
>on students  the Delta Project included 
>expenses on instruction and student services. 
>Also included in that figure is the per-student 
>share of administrative functions tied to 
>academics, academic support and operations and maintenance.
>Tuition increases outpaced per-student spending 
>even more dramatically at public master's institutions and community colleges.
>Private institutions, on the other hand, are 
>charging students more and putting more money 
>into instruction at the same time, according to 
>the report. At private research institutions, 
>for instance, tuition went up by $985, but 
>per-student spending actually rose by $1,453. 
>Whether that spending translated into a higher 
>quality education, however, remains to be seen.
>"This [report] tells us how we spend our money, 
>but it doesn't tell us about effectiveness," Wellman said.
>The report does note that community colleges, 
>for instance, are able to spend less money per 
>student on the path toward graduation. Wellman 
>concedes, however, that there's no way to 
>determine whether what's gained in savings isn't lost in quality.
>Richard Vedder, a professor of economics at Ohio 
>University, applauded the report for shining a 
>light on how universities do business. At the 
>same time, Vedder lamented that no one has been 
>able to demonstrate effectively whether spending 
>increases are helping colleges to better educate students.
>"What they have not done [in the report], 
>because it's almost impossible to do, is measure 
>performance, measure outcomes," said Vedder, 
>director of the Center for College Affordability 
>and Productivity. "Are the students learning? We 
>have very limited  almost no  measure of outcomes."
>So where is all the money going? At most types 
>of institutions, an increasing share of 
>"education and related" spending goes toward 
>administrative support and student services, 
>while instruction  including faculty salaries  
>is falling as a percentage of those expenses. 
>Administrative expenses made up the most 
>significant share of "education and related" 
>expenses at private bachelor's institutions, 
>where 44.2 percent of the cost of educating 
>students was devoted to administration in 2006, according to the report.
>Data Brings Sunshine
>The greatest value of the Delta Project's report 
>may yet to be realized. Leaders of the project, 
>which is funded by the Lumina Foundation for 
>Education, plan to create a Web-based function 
>that will allow users to look at the spending 
>and revenue data of individual institutions. 
>While the raw data is already public through the 
>federal data clearinghouse for higher education, 
>known as the Integrated Postsecondary Education 
>Data System (IPEDS), the Delta Project hopes to 
>create a function that adds context and meaning 
>to the often dizzying IPEDS numbers.
>Charles Miller, who chaired the U.S. Secretary 
>of Education's Commission on the Future of 
>Higher Education, said he welcomes the greater 
>sunshine that the Delta Project is bringing to postsecondary education.
>"Unless you have data that's in this kind of 
>form, it's very hard to make decisions and 
>policy judgments that are objective," he said.
>After reviewing the report, Miller said the 
>Delta Project had made a data-driven case for 
>reform, without having to use the sometimes 
>tough language that's found in many such 
>reports, including the one Miller's own commission presented.
>"It doesn't say 'Here are the failings of the 
>system,' and a lot of the report is going to 
>avoid doing that, but [Wellman] implies it," he said.
>In an interview with Inside Higher Ed, Wellman 
>noted that the lack of transparency in higher 
>education is a problem in and of itself. 
>Institutions are reluctant to engage in much 
>introspection about costs, because it raises 
>"uncomfortable questions," she said. At a time 
>when state support and private giving are sure 
>to keep declining, however, it would behoove 
>college leaders to closely examine exactly where 
>they're getting money and spending money, Wellman said.
>"We're robbing Peter to pay Paul," she said. "We 
>better find out who Peter and Paul are. 
>viewed online at 
>
http://insidehighered.com/news/2009/01/15/delta.
>Labels: college costs